SISTEMA DE BIBLIOTECAS


Representations of nature on the mongolian steppe : an investigation of scientific knowledge construction.

By: Material type: ArticleArticlePublication details: Arlington American Antropological Association 2000Subject(s): In: American anthropologistSummary: Extensive land degradation across the Mongolian steppe has prompted a variety of multinational and multidisciplinary research projects over recent years. The situation provides an important opportunity to investigate and illuminate some of the international, national, and local dimensions of scientific practice that critically condition the production of environmental knowledge. In this article I juxtapose the competing knowledge bases and assumptions of various relevant groups (including natural vs. social scientists, nationalist Chinese vs. ethnic Mongolians, and urban intellectuals vs. indigenous herders) to develop the argument that multiple ideological and institutional boundaries work together to circumscribe scientific inquiry and data collection. The situated construction of knowledge undermines prospects for improving incremental objectivity and impedes more comprehensive understanding of serious environmental problems.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Collection Call number Copy number Status Date due Barcode
Analítica de revista Biblioteca Central Colección General General AM. ANTHROPOL.-03/00 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available FICTICIO168

En: American Anthropologist. -- Vol. 102 No. 3 (Septiembre 2000), pp. 503-519. ISSN 00027294

Extensive land degradation across the Mongolian steppe has prompted a variety of multinational and multidisciplinary research projects over recent years. The situation provides an important opportunity to investigate and illuminate some of the international, national, and local dimensions of scientific practice that critically condition the production of environmental knowledge. In this article I juxtapose the competing knowledge bases and assumptions of various relevant groups (including natural vs. social scientists, nationalist Chinese vs. ethnic Mongolians, and urban intellectuals vs. indigenous herders) to develop the argument that multiple ideological and institutional boundaries work together to circumscribe scientific inquiry and data collection. The situated construction of knowledge undermines prospects for improving incremental objectivity and impedes more comprehensive understanding of serious environmental problems.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.



©2023 Unidad de Procesos Comunicacionales / Universidad Academia de Humanismo Cristiano