Megamarsupial extinction : the carrying capacity argument / R. Esmée Webb.
Material type:![Article](/opac-tmpl/lib/famfamfam/AR.png)
Item type | Current library | Collection | Call number | Copy number | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Analítica de revista | Biblioteca Central Colección General | General | ANTIQUITY-275/98 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | FICTICIO415 |
Browsing Biblioteca Central shelves, Shelving location: Colección General Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
ANTIQUITY-275/98 Headroom and human trampling : | ANTIQUITY-275/98 Pleistocene settlement in the Australian arid zone : | ANTIQUITY-275/98 Some observations on the radiocarbon and cosmogenic isotope dating of petroglyphs, Foz Côa, Portugal / | ANTIQUITY-275/98 Megamarsupial extinction : | ANTIQUITY-276/98 Antiquity. | ANTIQUITY-277/98 Antiquity. | ANTIQUITY-277/98 Issues in Brazilian archaeology / |
Antiquity 72 (1999): 46Ð55
An ancient and contentious debate in prehistory (Owen 1846; Lyell 1863) asks if the megafauna of newly colonized worlds was exterminated by human hunting, or whether other factors, such as changing climate, were decisive. Debate on this issue remains lively in Australia, because its harsh environments surely posed problems for very large mammals. A starting-point for this fresh look at megafaunal extinction was Flannery's (1994) adoption of the 'blitzkrieg' hypothesis, in which humanly caused kill-off was so rapid it left no decisive archaeological traces.
There are no comments on this title.