Stonehenge : is the medium the message? / John C. Barrett.
Material type:
ArticleSubject(s):
In:
Anthropology TodaySummary: In June ANTIQUITY published a novel contribution by Mike Parker Pearson and his Madagascan colleague Ramilisonina, which addressed the question of the significance of stone at Stonehenge(ANTIQUITY 72: 308Ð76). They argued that stone symbolized death and the dead, and provided examples from ethnographic studies to support this notion. The paper has stimulated two repliesÐfrom John Barrett & Kathryn Fewster, and from Alasdair Whittle. We are pleased to publish these here, as part of the continuing debate on analogy in archaeology, and on Stonehenge.
| Item type | Current library | Collection | Call number | Copy number | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analítica de revista | Biblioteca Central Colección General | General | ANTIQUITY-278/98 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | FICTICIO462 |
Browsing Biblioteca Central shelves, Shelving location: Colección General Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Antiquity 72 (1998): 847Ð852
In June ANTIQUITY published a novel contribution by Mike Parker Pearson and his Madagascan colleague Ramilisonina, which addressed the question of the significance of stone at Stonehenge(ANTIQUITY 72: 308Ð76). They argued that stone symbolized death and the dead, and provided examples from ethnographic studies to support this notion. The paper has stimulated two repliesÐfrom John Barrett & Kathryn Fewster, and from Alasdair Whittle. We are pleased to publish these here, as part of the continuing debate on analogy in archaeology, and on Stonehenge.
There are no comments on this title.