Radiocarbon dating : avoiding errors by avoiding mixed samples / P.J. Ashmore.
Material type: ArticleSubject(s): In: Anthropology TodaySummary: Chronology and its refinement continues to be important, especially in the methods by which the dates are actually achieved. Here, the question of whether single object/bone samples provide more accurate dates than mixed samples is debated, and applied to samples from prehistoric Scotland.Item type | Current library | Collection | Call number | Copy number | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Analítica de revista | Biblioteca Central Colección General | General | ANTIQUITY-279/99 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | FICTICIO483 |
Browsing Biblioteca Central shelves, Shelving location: Colección General Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
ANTIQUITY-279/99 A later bronze age shield from South Cadbury, Somerset, England / | ANTIQUITY-279/99 Muck 'n' molecules : | ANTIQUITY-279/99 The archaeology of Dian : | ANTIQUITY-279/99 Radiocarbon dating : | ANTIQUITY-279/99 New advances in French prehistory / | ANTIQUITY-279/99 Is archaeological valuation an accounting matter? / | ANTIQUITY-279/99 Questions of epistemology and a working hypothesis about engravings of the 5th millennium in western France / |
Antiquity 73 (1999): 124Ð130
Chronology and its refinement continues to be important, especially in the methods by which the dates are actually achieved. Here, the question of whether single object/bone samples provide more accurate dates than mixed samples is debated, and applied to samples from prehistoric Scotland.
There are no comments on this title.