Is archaeological valuation an accounting matter? / John Carman, Garry D. Carnegie and Peter W. Wolnizer.
Material type: ArticleSubject(s): In: Anthropology TodaySummary: How can a value be put on the past? This article promotes discussion of how archaeologists and museum curators are being forced into providing valuations for thier 'resource' and collections, and conforming to accounting practices.Item type | Current library | Collection | Call number | Copy number | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Analítica de revista | Biblioteca Central Colección General | General | ANTIQUITY-279/99 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | FICTICIO476 |
Browsing Biblioteca Central shelves, Shelving location: Colección General Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
ANTIQUITY-279/99 The archaeology of Dian : | ANTIQUITY-279/99 Radiocarbon dating : | ANTIQUITY-279/99 New advances in French prehistory / | ANTIQUITY-279/99 Is archaeological valuation an accounting matter? / | ANTIQUITY-279/99 Questions of epistemology and a working hypothesis about engravings of the 5th millennium in western France / | ANTIQUITY-279/99 Distance and decay : | ANTIQUITY-279/99 Is post-processualism bound to happen everywhere? The French case / |
Antiquity 73 (1999): 143Ð148
How can a value be put on the past? This article promotes discussion of how archaeologists and museum curators are being forced into providing valuations for thier 'resource' and collections, and conforming to accounting practices.
There are no comments on this title.
Log in to your account to post a comment.