Has Australia backdated the Human Revolution? / Chris Stringer.
Material type:![Article](/opac-tmpl/lib/famfamfam/AR.png)
Item type | Current library | Collection | Call number | Copy number | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Analítica de revista | Biblioteca Central Colección General | General | ANTIQUITY-282/99 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | FICTICIO520 |
Browsing Biblioteca Central shelves, Shelving location: Colección General Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
ANTIQUITY-282/99 The oldest metallurgy in western Europe / | ANTIQUITY-282/99 Flint and pyrite : | ANTIQUITY-282/99 Palaeolithic mollusc exploitation at Riparo Mochi (Balzi Rossi, Italy) : | ANTIQUITY-282/99 Has Australia backdated the Human Revolution? / | ANTIQUITY-282/99 Marine investigations in the Lakshadweep Islands, India / | ANTIQUITY-282/99 Seeds of urbanism : | ANTIQUITY-INDICE 51-65 Antiquity. |
Antiquity 73 (1999): 876Ð879
Australia has usually played a supporting role in the story of human evolution Ñ regarded as a place at the edge of the inhabited world where modern humans arrived relatively late and then remained largely isolated from subsequent developments. However, new dates for a human burial at Mungo, New South Wales (Thorne et al. 1999) may not only force revision of views about the peopling of Australia, but also have a wider impact on ideas about modern human origins.
There are no comments on this title.