000 | 01231cab a2200205 a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
999 |
_c25445 _d25445 |
||
001 | 025445 | ||
003 | UAHC_CL | ||
005 | 20180807113622.0 | ||
008 | 050614b xx j 000 1 eng | ||
040 |
_aUAHC_CL _cUAHC_CL _dUAHC_CL |
||
100 | 1 | _aOakley, John H. | |
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aWhy study a Greek vase-painter?ña response to Whitley's 'Beazley as theorist' / _cJohn H. Oakley. |
500 | _aAntiquity 72 (1999): 209-213 | ||
520 | _aJohn Oakley defends the legacy of Beazley in response to James Whitley's recent analysis of Beazley and his followers (ANTIQUITY 72: 40Ð47). The debate demonstrates how influential some past figures of archaeological methodology still are, and how diverse are the approaches of modern scholars in interpreting and using their legacy. | ||
653 | _aANTROPOLOGIA | ||
773 | 0 |
_tAnthropology Today. _w025359 |
|
900 | _aANTIQUITY-275/98 | ||
942 |
_cREVA _2ddc |