| 000 | 01684cab a2200217 a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 999 |
_c25480 _d25480 |
||
| 001 | 025480 | ||
| 003 | UAHC_CL | ||
| 005 | 20180807114715.0 | ||
| 008 | 050614b xx j 000 1 eng | ||
| 040 |
_aUAHC_CL _cUAHC_CL _dUAHC_CL |
||
| 100 | 1 | _aBarrett, John C. | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aStonehenge : _bis the medium the message? / _cJohn C. Barrett. |
| 500 | _aAntiquity 72 (1998): 847Ð852 | ||
| 520 | _aIn June ANTIQUITY published a novel contribution by Mike Parker Pearson and his Madagascan colleague Ramilisonina, which addressed the question of the significance of stone at Stonehenge(ANTIQUITY 72: 308Ð76). They argued that stone symbolized death and the dead, and provided examples from ethnographic studies to support this notion. The paper has stimulated two repliesÐfrom John Barrett & Kathryn Fewster, and from Alasdair Whittle. We are pleased to publish these here, as part of the continuing debate on analogy in archaeology, and on Stonehenge. | ||
| 653 | _aANTROPOLOGIA | ||
| 773 | 0 |
_tAnthropology Today. _w025359 |
|
| 900 | _aANTIQUITY-278/98 | ||
| 942 |
_cREVA _2ddc |
||