000			02613cam a2200253 a 4500
001			008490
003			UAHC_CL
005			20170803120448.0
008			170502s2010 xxk 000 eng
020			_a9780415474740
040			_aUAHC_CL _cUAHC_CL _dUAHC_CL
082	0	4	_a327.101 _bN812 _220
245	1	0	_aNon-Western International Relations Theory : _bperspectives on and beyond Asia / _cedited by Amitav Acharya and Barry Buzan.
260			_bRoutledge _aLondres _c2010
300			_a242 p.
505	0		_aIntroduction : conquest, coexistence and IR theory -- Liberal internationalism -- Democratization : republican liberalism versus commercial liberalism -- Self-determination : republication liberalism versus regulatory liberalism -- International organization : commercial liberalism versus regulatory literalism -- The conservative critique : realism -- The radical critique : critical theory and cosmopolitanism -- Middling, meddling, muddling? : three via medias.
520			_aGiven that the world has moved well beyond the period of Western colonialism, and clearly into a durable period in which non-Western cultures have gained their political autonomy, it is long past time that non-Western voices had a higher profile in debates about international relations, not just as disciples of Western schools of thought, but as inventors of their own approaches. Western IR theory has had the advantage of being the first in the field, and has developed many valuable insights, but few would defend the position that it captures everything we need to know about world politics.\In this book, Acharya and Buzan introduce non-Western IR traditions to a Western IR audience, and challenge the dominance of Western theory. An international team of experts reinforce existing criticisms that IR theory is Western-focused and therefore misrepresents and misunderstands much of world history by introducing the reader to non-Western traditions, literature and histories relevant to how IR is conceptualised.\Including case studies on Chinese, Japanese, South Korean, Southeast Asian, Indian and Islamic IR this book redresses the imbalance and opens up a cross-cultural comparative perspective on how and why thinking about IR has developed in the way it has. As such, it will be invaluable reading for both Western and Asian audiences interested in international relations theory. _bProvided by publisher.
521			_aRelaciones Internacionales
651		4	_aASIA _xRELACIONES EXTERIORES
653			_aCIENCIAS POLITICAS
700	1		_aAcharya, Amitav _eed.
700	1		_aBuzan, Barry _eed.
900			_a327.101 NON
942			_cBK
999			_c8490 _d8490